tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post509070330721849641..comments2023-08-07T16:41:49.660+02:00Comments on Die Klimazwiebel: Which way forward for the IPCC?eduardohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17725131974182980651noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-10451037873490452492010-03-24T21:43:40.797+01:002010-03-24T21:43:40.797+01:00This is getting off topic pretty fast.
I really ...This is getting off topic pretty fast. <br /><br />I really like the Wiki idea (Although I imagine it more like a vast content management system, more modern than a classic Wiki and less anarchic). Rotating lead authors and teams. Pretty interesting to think about how the updating, commenting and change of this continuous work in progress would look like._Flin_noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-75337163957238352562010-03-24T07:31:35.638+01:002010-03-24T07:31:35.638+01:00@P Gosselin:
Great, the Latif-lie again. Or rather...@P Gosselin:<br />Great, the Latif-lie again. Or rather, the Jonathan Leake-lie of Mojib Latif's predictions:<br />http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jan/11/climate-change-global-warming-mojib-latif<br /><br />Note that Leake also misrepresented the article of Keenlyside et al (with Talif one of the co-authors), of which the prediction shows this:<br />http://www.ifm-geomar.de/fileadmin/ifm-geomar/fuer_alle/institut/PR/science/keenlyside/global_temp_s.jpg<br /><br />30 years of cooling? Where?Marcohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07262670367947223521noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-11605827616532610192010-03-23T21:12:37.482+01:002010-03-23T21:12:37.482+01:00Are Prof, Latif's views reflected in the IPCC ...Are Prof, Latif's views reflected in the IPCC report?<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mV-j4cB8qmg<br />Is he retired or something? He's got a lot of nerve saying dissident stuff like that. I wonder what PIK thinks about that?P Gosselinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-25105280475208296542010-03-23T20:19:47.417+01:002010-03-23T20:19:47.417+01:00@ghost
Appointments to the IPCC should be non-poli...@ghost<br />Appointments to the IPCC should be non-political.<br /><br />On Storch's idea: IPCC chapters are teamwork. People who can't work in a team should not be part of the IPCC. IPCC chapters should reflect on the literature. People who see their own brilliance in every reflection should not be part of the IPCC.richardtolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14239680555557587153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-39790325877796925972010-03-23T20:17:25.052+01:002010-03-23T20:17:25.052+01:00The Wall Street Journal has an op-ed on the IPCC. ...The Wall Street Journal has an op-ed on the IPCC. It's posted here at Ice Cap.<br />http://icecap.us/index.phpP Gosselinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-38518425859223511112010-03-23T20:12:30.281+01:002010-03-23T20:12:30.281+01:00@Richard
hm, I have a question, you say: Nominatio...@Richard<br />hm, I have a question, you say: Nominations to IPCC positions should be based on academic quality only.<br /><br />Well, but Prof von Storch is saying: authors "dominating" a field should not be lead authors. Of course, quality and domination do not always correspond, but sometimes they do. How to solve? Let little post docs do the work?<br /><br />"run by the departments of environment."<br /><br />that is not really true. For the US the Department of Energy takes part and in the UK it is the Department of Energy and Climate Change. (the creation of the DECC would be a nice article, IMHO), I think. The mixture of political views, the DoE of the Bush administration was not alarmist at all, in contrary, can be a strong point of a report IMHO, but it can also watering everything.ghostnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-71419023163984137772010-03-23T17:35:11.696+01:002010-03-23T17:35:11.696+01:00There reforms are key to the future success of the...There reforms are key to the future success of the IPCC.<br /><br />First, the IPCC should be run by the departments of research or the national academies, rather than by the departments of environment. Nominations to IPCC positions should be based on academic quality only.<br /><br />Second, the IPCC should enforce its procedures.<br /><br />Third, the IPCC chairs should leave the bureau, which should become an independent board.richardtolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14239680555557587153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-77350996706016930982010-03-23T14:13:09.407+01:002010-03-23T14:13:09.407+01:00I'm currently involved in an endeavour concern...I'm currently involved in an endeavour concerning the examination of the IPCC working groups, <br />Richard Tol is correct w.r.t. WG3. I'm astounded by the number of references to what appears to be advocacy groups. Anyway, there will be more about this soon enough.P Gosselinnoreply@blogger.com