tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post5872522604370691284..comments2023-08-07T16:41:49.660+02:00Comments on Die Klimazwiebel: Climate change in the mediaeduardohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17725131974182980651noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-59465647670742979572010-10-15T14:06:42.520+02:002010-10-15T14:06:42.520+02:00(@)Reiner Grundmann and Zajko,
first, in general ...(@)<b>Reiner Grundmann</b> and <b>Zajko</b>,<br /><br />first, in general it is great to see open access (articles/blogs etc.) -- leastwise ever online. <br /><br />If I get the point right that you took only Google('s hits) solely "of February 19th 2008" and that after all "the Google frequencies were roughly matched by the Nexis data", then it will be interesting for instance to compare the results with the outcomings of future studies. Also it will be absorbing if we be able to envision the numbers around 19/11/2009. I commend humbly two further search terms which include "both" a "scientific dimension" and "political or moral aspects": <br /><br />* "climategate"<br /><br />* "climate scientist"(TM)<br /><br />In later November 2009 we were able to watch Goggle's claim that the search engine got more than 27.000.000 hits for "climategate". 27.000.000 -- even already without attracting interest from most of the "Main Stream Media" ("quality"/"prestiged" papers/media etc.) Guess what! In mid December 2009 the Climategate term generated a greater number than the search results for "global warming" or "Co2".<br /><br />But during that December something happened to climategate: nearly per day millions of ghits were seen disappearing, never to be seen again. Contemporary Google's algorithm asserts for example to count for "climategate" 3.500.000 and for climategate (searched without quotation marks) ~850.000 ghits. On the "other" side ghits for the search terms "global warming" and "CO2" increased immense by now to ~42.000.000 (GW) and ~41.000.000 (CO2). <br /><br />--- --- ---<br /><br /><b>@all</b> with regard to <b>Google News</b>,<br /><br />does somebody has any idea under what conditions <i>Klimazwiebel</i> will be listet under <i><a href="http://news.google.de/news/search?cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=klimazwiebel&cf=all&scoring=n&nolr=1" rel="nofollow">Google News</a></i>? I think this Klimazwiebel-Blog is relevant enough to appear newsworthy there. Yeah, well I am not really good in writing -- please engage with Google and/or other search engines. <br /><br />namenlosAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-90533790083301130222010-10-14T00:02:30.130+02:002010-10-14T00:02:30.130+02:00Looks interesting. It would be great to see a simi...Looks interesting. It would be great to see a similar analysis for what happened in 2009/2010.Zajkonoreply@blogger.com