tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post1796862138910552379..comments2023-08-07T16:41:49.660+02:00Comments on Die Klimazwiebel: The old scripteduardohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17725131974182980651noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-55111135906063274102012-04-26T10:14:16.645+02:002012-04-26T10:14:16.645+02:00Don't we have some sort of a problem here? I m...Don't we have some sort of a problem here? I mean, from a "warmist" perspective there seem to be two strategies. Or you exaggerate a la Van der Hoeven, or you try to be "reasonable". But in the later case someone may ask you: Why not wait something like a decade, and try to see whether temperatures point to +6ºC (Van der Hoeven), +3,5º (IPCC), +1ºC (sceptics), or no warming at all (super sceptics)?<br /><br />I see some difficulties when "warmists" try to address such question (without exaggeration). It may be the case they have a pet policy, more or less independent from the reason.plazaemehttp://plazamoyua.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-9701568866494958922012-04-25T12:57:07.572+02:002012-04-25T12:57:07.572+02:00All "climate policy" is political hyster...All "climate policy" is political hysteria, based upon misinformation from an incompetent climate science that has suborned all of the supposedly authoritative institutions. The unreasoning fear inherent in the lady's words, above, is unprecedented in the modern science era, and it is but a symptom of insane clinging to false, imagined fear rather than a healthy understanding of the clear stability of the natural world. The false fear follows, of course, the false thinking of Malthus and Darwin, and the current scientific paradigm, or philosophy, is Darwinian, which shows how imbedded and long-cultivated is the hysteria in modern science. It has come boiling to the surface in climate science and in earnest but insane "climate policies", which gives everyone a chance to recognize the real underlying danger, of hysterical, dogmatic thinking at the very heart of the natural sciences today. Man can and often has fouled his own habitat, as by deforestation, but the world is over 70% ocean, beyond Man's ability to change it. The world today needs to grow up and cast off childish fears, and blaming others for those fears.Harry Dale Huffmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03210275295826050501noreply@blogger.com