tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post1857822245807706374..comments2023-08-07T16:41:49.660+02:00Comments on Die Klimazwiebel: The cartelleduardohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17725131974182980651noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-2114716606058331992009-12-18T16:49:07.807+01:002009-12-18T16:49:07.807+01:00Dr von Storch, we would like to publish the Englis...Dr von Storch, we would like to publish the English version of this at Pajamas Media. Please contact me at chasrmartin (at) gmail (dot) com.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-52706198762668728092009-12-08T01:18:38.968+01:002009-12-08T01:18:38.968+01:00Most sceptics I know favour nuclear energy.
This h...Most sceptics I know favour nuclear energy.<br />This has a lot of benefits: stable power generation, independence of middle east and russian gas, infrastructure for future fusion generation, cheap, clean. And if Co2 were really that dangerous, which indeed most sceptics doubt, <b>a very substantial reduction in emissions</b>. Only 16GW would make every dutch household gas free.<br /><br />But "nuclear" is a banned word in Copenhagen.Hans Errenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17187651692955617994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-60025049280142985102009-12-07T17:45:20.065+01:002009-12-07T17:45:20.065+01:00Agree with the former comments. Most "sceptic...Agree with the former comments. Most "sceptics" I know favours energy efficiency, additional alternative for energy production, the advance of technology regarding important environmental problems etc.. However planned econymy action based on manipulated science (or shall we say science based on unpublished data) does not serve this cause. The experiece from the 20th century is that market economy handles this vastly better. I react against the AGW matter as it manipulates science in order to build a "we and them" fealing among large groups of citizens around the world. Which is exploited by politiciens, green lobbyist organisations and companies.Svennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-40990611545462418452009-12-07T15:01:56.963+01:002009-12-07T15:01:56.963+01:00Sceptics favour also just one course of action – d...<i>Sceptics favour also just one course of action – doing nothing.</i><br /><br />While appreciating your attempt to be even-handed this is simply wrong. Many who are sceptical of alarmist AGW theories want many things done including more efficient, less polluting energy sources.Richnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-91054110725076803162009-12-07T14:10:36.409+01:002009-12-07T14:10:36.409+01:00We can be green without being extreme. I am withou...We can be green without being extreme. I am without a doubt a "denier" about C02 driven AGW. I also think that man impacts the environment in both heating and cooling ways that we do not fully undestand. Being more clean and more efficient is just common sense. Forcing massive changes to reduce consumption based upon "carbon" is silly and seems to be driven by a world view that has existed for centuries going back to Malthus. So I respectfully disagree with Dr. von Storch that deniers want to do nothing. I just want to avoid foolish actions where the cure is much worse than the not understood disease. We can continue to be green while not being foolishly extreme.<br /><br />Thank you to the owners and whom ever leaked this information. The scientific method faithfully applied is a thing of beauty. What the AGW advocates have done is an insult to all of us on all sides of the debate.Green Research and Dev Managernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-59290593724991962322009-12-07T11:02:47.114+01:002009-12-07T11:02:47.114+01:00My deep respect goes out to both scientists Von St...My deep respect goes out to both scientists Von Storch and Zorita for their integrety in the midth of the current scientific corruption. <br />Hopefully their brave example will find many followers between other scientists who still have some decency left.<br />Gratuliere Hans and Eduardo!Hoi Polloinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-11068358821023926542009-12-07T05:49:48.471+01:002009-12-07T05:49:48.471+01:00How about the middle middle between alarmism and u...How about the middle middle between alarmism and ultra-skepticism as explained by Robert Murphy in this post at MasterResource:<br />http://www.masterresource.org/2009/12/sarcastic-responses-to-climategate-misconstrue-the-real-debate/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8216971263350849959.post-77196400741542819992009-12-07T04:41:15.190+01:002009-12-07T04:41:15.190+01:00"The other group knows that all this talk abo..."The other group knows that all this talk about anthropogenic climate change and its dire consequences is false, a hoax; elevated greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere have no or only an insignificant effect, mostly positive indeed."<br /><br />I have heard a great deal about this group. But I wonder, do they really exist, or are they just a myth?<br /><br />The leading skeptical sites (the Pielkes, McIntyre, etc.) are run by people who accept the basic physics of the situation and categorically reject the idea that AGW is some sort of hoax.<br /><br />So I'd like to know who you are referring to when you talk about this "other group".<br /><br />Aside from Senator Inhofe and his former aide, is anyone influential seriously babbling about a climate hoax?Jasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05256270264787307019noreply@blogger.com