To bring this picture of Germany home to the American readers, he quotes our regular klimazwiebel guest Peter Heller, who makes the most American comparison imaginable:
“Just as creationists attempt to ban the theory of evolution from the school books,” said a physicist, Peter Heller, in a Web posting that challenged the national nuclear orthodoxy, “it almost seems as if every factual and neutral explanation in Germany is now in the process of being deleted” from the nuclear debate.No doubt, now the reader of the New York Times will understand that Germany is once more beyond the rational. The rest of the article is an interesting mix of telephone interviews and quotes from usual suspects in things German Befindlichkeit, from the Sueddeutsche Zeitung, der Spiegel, Max Planck Institute and Hertie School of Governnance:
In Germany, Professor Kemfert said, political groups, civil society organizations and faith groups all oppose nuclear power. “These groups all oppose nuclear power,” she said. “This is different in other countries.”
Werner,
ReplyDeletethe question is if the national stereotypes are more or less accurate and I think there is something to be said re. the special German risk averseness. This has nothing to do with a German national 'character' but with political decisions which reflect earlier constellations. Basically, Merkel's decision goes back to the status quo ante of the red-green exit strategy. Germany has an energy excess which makes this feasible. It is 'only' a matter of cost where to get the cheapest energy from (e.g. nuclear from France or fossil from reserve plants in Germany)