Dear readers and contributors,
a few months ago Blogger introduced a spam-filter, which apparently cannot be switched-off. The spam-filter seems to be too restrictive sometimes. Interpreting Blogger's description of the spam-filter it seems that it runs on a learning algorithm, and hopefully, as time progresses, the algorithm will learn to tell spam from non-spam. I will try to look into the spam-filter often, but if you suspect that a comment has been unduly arrested, drop me a line, and I will bail it out.
Popular Posts
-
In an e-mail to GWPF, Lennart Bengtsson has declared his resignation of the advisory board of GWPF. His letter reads : " I have bee...
-
Lennart Bengtsson sent me this manuscript and asked for publication. Maybe a few words about who Lennart Bengtsson is are in order. He i... -
CLIMATE CHANGE ARBITRATION BIAS AT WIKIPEDIA by Alex HARVEY h/t GoRight Recent events in the labyrinthine world of the Wikipedia c...
-
In a previous thread, we were discussing the claims of desmoblog.com, which presented leaked e-mails and documents supposedly originating ...
-
The discussion on the thread " hottest year on record " has moved away from the original topic and has focussed on the merits, an...
-
I have a short piece in Nature Geoscience with the title 'Climate change as a wicked social problem'. Here is the link http://rdcu....
-
Das Umweltbundesamt hat eine Broschüre herausgebracht mit dem Titel: " Und sie erwärmt sich doch. Was steckt hinter der Debatte um den ...
-
With the fifth assessment report soon to be released by the IPCC the pre-publication buzz is well underway. A while ago unauthorised dr...
-
Some readers have expressed their interest in discussion about the recent paper on climate reconstructions methods A statistical analysis of...
-
The Guardian has a short article on this issue. Damian Carrington reports that '2016 will very likely be the hottest year on reco...
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
3 comments:
@Edu
But it's allways me! There is a conspiracy going on here.
OT Do you think that this affair has any relevance for climate science in general? Probably not.
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2010/10/wegman_scandal_gmu_investigate.php
@ 1,
Georg, no I do not think it is relevant for science, but I think there a couple of things worth discussing about. We can open a thread..
@Edu
Well at least I understand that Bradley thinks it's mildly ironic that someone who is critizising his work is actually copying his work. (I have Bradleys "Paleoclimatology" at home and it's not difficult to find some stuff).
But on the other hand, hell, what could he do? He never worked on that stuff, so he took a book (I would do the same). Ok, I should have taken another book. Just for good manners.
PS If this comes through it's already my second post in arow. The filter trusts me.
Post a Comment (pop-up window,non-moderated)